|
In usual case, you entrepreneurs would use employee evaluation form and
checklist for employee performance evaluation.
We, Existenz Co., Ltd, make a proposal with a more specific focus, which is global and epochal methods.
First of all, please assume the following human relation of Mr Smith, Mr
Johnson and Ms Miller in a small firms or divisions.
|
|
|
Who are excellent employee?
1. Mr Smith think that Johnson and Miller are excellent member in his team.
2. Mr Johnson evaluate Mr Smith as outstanding member.
3. Ms Miller think that Johnson is the only really talented member. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
What do you think ? Please imagine elections. Naturally, Johnson get two
votes, so Johnson may be the most excellent employee.
But, please wait !. According to our epochal employee evaluation methods,
as for employee performance evaluations, Smith and Johnso is the same.
The most effective features of this employee evaluation methods is that
you entrepreneurs can quantify employee performance evaluation and that
it's reciprocal evaluation between emplyees. Moreover, it's easy, effective
and non time-consuming methods suitable for global and inclusive employee
performance evaluation. Please see below.
| Calculation iteration count |
1=start |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Omission |
41 |
42 |
43=final score |
| Smith |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.375 |
>>>>>>>>> |
0.400001 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
| Miller |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.125 |
0.25 |
>>>>>>>>> |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
| Johnson |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.375 |
0.375 |
>>>>>>>>> |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
The results show that Mr Smith and Mr Johnsonget is the same. To understand why such a result occurred, please focus attention on the
fact that Smith are highly evaluated by Johnson, who is highly evaluated
by others. That is, only real excellent and outstanding employee can know who are
excellent ! Please pay attention to this simple and clear fact !.
The more other employee highly evaluate him or her and the more the acclaimed employee(=Johnson) highly evaluate him or her, the more the employee(=Smith) is highly evaluated. It is the heart of this quantified employee evaluation ranking methods.
|
|